Fukushima’s total clean-up!!!

(1)I’ve summarized the contents so far
(2)And secondly, the brainless children just go
(3)What is contained in the contaminated water
(4)The Japanese government announced that the first one included a total of 62 nuclides
(5)It now contains a total of 64 nuclides
(6)It has never been verified in a third country
(7)What is the system called ALPS
(8)System Created by Japan’s Toshiba After Fukushima Accident
(9)It’s a device that filters out nuclides that have ions
(10)But the performance in Ioga, Japan
(11)Is it okay to treat it with 3 ALPS
(12)The Japanese government has argued that ALPS’s filters have been very large
(13)There were two accidents that were damaged and failed to filter out nuclides
(14)In other words, we don’t know what the treatment water is currently stored in the tank
(15)Is it okay to process it with 4 ALPS
(16)Japan insists it’s OK, IAEA says it’s OK too, but scientists have asked TEPCO several times about scientifically inexplicable data results, but they don’t know
(17)5 What are the results of the Pacific Book Bureau Forum PIF’s verification
(18)Dr. Ferenc Dalnoki-Beres, a member of the PIF Scientists Committee and a U.S. nuclear physicist, pointed out that the Fukushima contaminated water data provided by TEPCO is inaccurate, incomplete, and biased
(19)6 Then why does the IAEA support discharging contaminated water
(20)Because the IAEA is an interest group in the world’s nuclear power industry and countries that use nuclear power

(1)7 Why Japan even wants to release the ocean by giving bribes
(2)It’s because of the money. It’s because it’s the cheapest
(3)397.9 billion won
(4)162.4 billion
(5)100 billion won
(6)34.9 billion
(7)3.4 billion won
(8)Stratification Injection Underground Releases Hydrogen Emissions Water Vapor Emissions Ocean Emission
(9)Alps Subcommittee on the Treatment of Contaminated Water 20184
(10)What did lawmakers of the National Power Party say in the previous administration
(11)Former floor leader of the People’s Power Party Joo Ho-young also attended a general meeting of lawmakers on April 16, 2021
(12)We should not first provide any excuse to rationalize and justify the discharge of contaminated water
(13)Minister of Land, Infrastructure and Transport Won Hee-ryong was the governor of Jeju Island at the time, but the IAEA said that Japan and the U.S. are already very strong and the nuclear agency is safe to discharge contaminated water
(14)Resolution 20210429 of the Kuomintang
(15)The resolution argues that Contaminated water contains more than 60 kinds of radioactive substances, including tritium, which is fatal to the human body, and it is difficult to completely remove them
(16)Experts say the National Assembly of the Republic of Korea strongly condemns the Japanese government’s unilateral decision to release Fukushima radioactively contaminated water to the sea and immediately withdraw the decision
(17)I urge you

(1)The Japanese government condemned Fukushima’s decision to discharge radioactive contaminated water
(2)The Korean government’s plan to secure the safety of contaminated water from nuclear power plants
(3)a resolution calling for active countermeasures
(4)Date of motion 2021 429
(5)Proponents Cho Taeyong, Kang Dae-sik and Kim Ki-
(6)Kim Seok-ki, Kim Sung-won, Kim Tae-ho, Park Dae-soo, Park Jeon, Lee Tae-gyu, Jeon Bong-min, Jeong Jin-seok, Jeong Chan-min, Ji Sung-ho, Choi Hyung-do, Tae Young-ho, Han Moo-kyung, Rep. 16
(7)Is there any other good way than to discharge the ocean
(8)Yes, Japan claims that there are no other nuclides except tritiumThen the radioactivity of this tritium can’t penetrate the human skin if it’s outside the body But it’s really dangerous if you’re exposed to the inside
(9)<>
(10)10 Japanese Government Government
(11)TEPCO is a representative political-friendly company How does the ruling Liberal Democratic Party work
(12)They want to solve the Fukushima problem as soon as possible, but on the other hand
(13)We’re working hard to reduce TEPCO’s handling costs That’s how much money you have to leave out
(14)But why do you agree with the ball