I’ve summarized the situation briefly

image text translation

(1)I calculated Chuu. If the cost is more than 70 percent of the sales, it’s the best
(2)The final settlement was negative The more I worked, the more debt I owed It’s definitely a 73 contract, but it’s 91 and 100 degrees. It’s late, but I wanted to fix it
(3)For example, if the sales are 100,000 won and the cost is 70,000 won = 70,000 won and 30,000 won, let’s subtract 55 from 35,000 won each, and the final profit of the company is -5,000 won Chuu moved on to this problem

image text translation

(1)Among the exclusive contracts of 2017124 Chuu,
(2)Article 7 Distribution of profits, etc. Gap Block Berry Chu
(3)The top priority is to deduct all expenses when distributing profits between A and BThe cost of entertainment activities, the cost of producing records, the cost of investment in a series related to B, the cost of training, and the cost of personal expenses are combined and settled
(4)1st and 2nd generation will earn money from all entertainment activities
(5)Priority distribution of A70 to 30 ratio
(6)2 After that, the expenses incurred in all entertainment activities of Party B shall be settled in the ratio of Party A 50 to Party B
(7)The boomerang of Blockberry trick
(8)On December 4, 2017, Chu signed an exclusive contract with Blockberry
(9)Article 7 Distribution of Profits, etc
(10)1A Blockberry and Eulchoo distribute income from all entertainment activities in the ratio of A70 to 30
(11)2. After that, the cost of all entertainment activities in Eul is calculated as a ratio of A50 to 50
(12)It’s obviously a problematic contract. The profit settlement ratio and the cost processing ratio are different. In other words, the profit is divided by 73 and the cost is equal to 55. In principle, the cost should also be divided by 73
(13)In addition, Blockberry chose the post-settlement system, dividing the revenue first and then subtracting the cost, which is more of a trick, and it’s like handing over 20 of the cost that Blockberry has to pay to Chu

image text translation

(1)⑩ Chu – D Director during rate adjustment meeting
(2)November 2021
(3)Think about it as I say. It’s never gonna hurt you
(4)Don’t write a contract for now. My distrust of it has been resolved
(5)But take the message
(6)I promised 55. Then, 73 and 55
(7)Let’s just look at arithmetic. Ji-Chu’s ratio is 55
(8)You went to elementary school. It’s not that HaHa didn’t
(9)That’s what he said
(10)I’m thinking about it’
(11)I’m kidding. I’m really upset
(12)Well, well, well
(13)I don’t think I’m in a relationship

Why is Chuu mad? Because she didn’t make enough money

No, because the contract has a ratio of 73 or 64, the amount of money you will receive is always the same

The problem with the 73 profit settlement contract after the first line 55 cost settlement is that it’s a fraud. How can you calculate debt when you work?

2 I’m having a meeting over the contract issue, and I’m being sarcastic about whether I came to elementary school or not

Leave a Comment