The reason why I didn’t go to Seoul National University

(1)posed a threat
(2)to escape the 10,000 threat
(3)- I fainted But I didn’t know that neither A nor B were there
(4)There are also acts of harm that do not infringe on Lee
(5)④ C is trying to throw a grenade at D
(6)D quickly shied away from the spot
(7)I was able to interfere with the throwing
(8)There is no population in self-defense for defensive offences that are absent
(9)But it was near D
(10)It would have been, and the latter
(11)The legal impunity of the above would have been that it would have worn ③
(12)It’s because it’s the right thing to do with 1 o
(13)① Intrinsic need
(14)one alternative
(15)90 ② 차악
(16)In local self-defense, attackers have the right not to be subjected to defensive harm
(17)→ Defensive harm to the attacker
(18)It’s not a violation of your rights!
(19)I don’t have the right in the first place!

(1)Diet trainee jinaganeuncheo Day 1
(2)I couldn’t go to Seoul National University because I didn’t have anything like this
(3)i xodusfromi 2일
(4)Everyone, let me recommend a great item to study
(5)Please try using blue lead。。
(6)I’m hesitant to write with a ballpoint pen, but it’s useful when I want to distinguish colors!!
(7)I personally think that the second concern is to show the thread when I read it again after I make a mistake
(8)in
(9)He’s in danger
(10)Away from the Mann Threat
(11)I knocked him out. But I didn’t know that neither A nor B were there
(12)There are also acts of harm that do not violate A
(13)④ C is trying to throw a grenade at D
(14)D is quick to get out of the way
(15)I was able to get in the way of the amulet
(16)There is no self-defense to take over a defensive act that is absent
(17)But it was near D
(18)It would have been, and it would have been worn in the latter
(19)The reason why the above is not legally punished is because it is the right thing to do with the transplant
(20)① Intrinsic need
(21)one alternative
(22)In self-defense, the attacker
(23)8 ② 차악
(24)The right not to be harmed defensively
(25)→ Defensive harm to the attacker
(26)It’s not a violation of your rights!
(27)1 Because you don’t have the right in the first place!!
(28)22214 thousand