(1)Two Black men are taken into police custody in handcuffs at Starbucks storeimage text translation
(1)It was the beginning of the incident that they asked the staff if they could use the bathroomimage text translation
(1)The staff told me to leave because I didn’t order a drinkimage text translation
(1)They didn’t go out saying they had to wait for someoneimage text translation
(1)The incident at a Starbucks store in Philadelphia five years agoimage text translation
(1)led to the Starbucks boycottimage text translation
(1)Shut the door!image text translation
(1)Finally, the CEO of Starbucks made a public apologyimage text translation
(1)There were also a series of disciplinary actions against the employees involved in the incidentimage text translation
(1)But there was a problem in this process, tooimage text translation
(1)I think it’s a good idea for Starbucksimage text translation
(2)To show that you responded
(3)White employees are being disciplined…
(4)a white manager with no connection to a racist incident
(5)I’m fired for refusing to take disciplinary action
(6)Shannon Phillips
(7)Philadelphia, New Jersey, etc
(8)Starbucks General Manager
(1)The black manager of the store that actually caused the problem wasn’t disciplined at allimage text translation
(1)He filed a lawsuit against Starbucks, claiming he was reversely discriminated against because he was whiteimage text translation
(1)A New Jersey court ruled in favor of Phillips, saying Starbucks violated anti-discrimination lawsimage text translation
(1)$25.6 million in reparations to Starbucksimage text translation
(1)He ordered us to pay 32.8 billion wonimage text translation
So that the race didn’t feel uncomfortable, they fired a white employee who wasn’t involved in the incident
Black employee who caused trouble compensates 32.8 billion in lawsuit for no disciplinary action