(1)a physical examination for the employment of fire officialsimage text translation
(2)Reviewing the application of male and female equal standards
(3)Input 20240110 PM 615 ·
(4)Correction 20240110 616 PM Article
(5)Reporter Oh Hyun-joo
(6)one family
(7)It’s the same for all applicants, regardless of gender
(8)Review steps to select suitable personnel for the fire department’s site
(9)Fire Department Logo Courtesy of Fire Department
(10)Seoul=News1 Reporter Oh Hyun-joo = The National Fire Agency will push for the same evaluation criteria to be applied to male and female applicants in the physical fitness test for hiring new firefighters from 2027
(11)According to the National Fire Agency on the 10th, the National Fire Agency submitted a plan to improve the physical fitness test for firefighters to the National Fire Agency in October last yearThe key is to evaluate all applicants on the same basis regardless of gender in the physical fitness test
(12)Single gender equality. To a fireman who is retrograde
(13)I’m looking for a job in my favor
(14)The 101,000 comments for 2024 are 41
(15)Go. 1022 N before you break the cane
(16)You’re going against the times
(17)It’s so pathetic
(18)Dr. Cheon, Dr. Cheon, Dr. Cheon, Dr. Cheon
(19)physical unificationLOLHey, unify the brain, too
(20)Lol, don’t leave the difference in writing scores alone
(21)I saw the full text, and there’s no distinction between them
(22)Let’s do it please ^^!
(23)Dr. L Chun Man 1031 N
(24)Wade, they said you should only strengthen your physical fitness test. LOL, a written test
(25)I don’t talk at all
(26)It’s 1011 N for the news
(27)We need to deconstruct it
(28)Steamed dried radish greens 1011 N
(29)Lol, that’s so ridiculous acknowledging the physical difference in the plan
(30)It’s not the same standard for each supporters, but I.G
(31)Yes, it’s from the same age. LOL JUN
(32)ㅋWhy do you talk about gender equality only in places like this
(33)WJSN Seol A, 1012 N
(34)A country that discriminates against all sexes
(35)LOL ㅋ한남피지컬로 여자랑 경들
(36)It’s like a ㅌㅊ
(37)It’s unreasonable. It’s misogynistic
!