(1)The prosecution’s meal receipt, which says it cannot disclose the details of special expenses, is also confidential in its investigation.image text translation
(2)Kang Yeon-joo’s press input 2023 1302125
(3)After losing the second trial of the information disclosure lawsuit, he appealed, claiming damage to the restaurant.
(4)Civic groups should be transparently disclosed according to the Yoon administration’s stance of the Supreme Prosecutors’ Office and the Central Prosecutors
(5)The prosecution appealed against the ruling of the appeal trial, which demanded the disclosure of special activity expenses and business promotion expenses, claiming that the meal receipt included in the special activity expense evidence could infer the investigation and damage restaurant operations.
(6)According to the Yoon Suk Yeoln government’s stance that the use of subsidies for civic groups should be transparently disclosed, it is pointed out that the prosecution’s special activities and labor expenses should also be transparently disclosed.
(7)According to the appeals of the Supreme Prosecutors’ Office and the Seoul Central District Prosecutors’ Office obtained by the Kyunghyang Shinmun on the 30th, the prosecution cited the fact that it is difficult to reclassify due to the vast amount of data.
(8)The prosecution said, “The amount of data related to special activity expenses is so vast that it is virtually impossible to reclassify them,” adding, “The reclassification work interferes with the prosecution’s normal operation.” It was also said that reading, sorting, and converting the books into electronic files for three years constitutes the processing and production of clear new information. The intention is that it is difficult to provide the data because it is not organized in the form requested by civic groups.
!