(1)A female teacher in her 30s who had sex with a second year of high school said, “I admit the facts.”image text translation
(2)Input 20230407 AM 1159 Modified 20230407 PM 1215 Article ID
(3)Reporter Kim Yoon-ki
(4)One is ⑤
(5)Sex and similar behavior from mid-May to the end of June last year
(6)”Victim maturity did not infringe on sexual self-determination Argument
(7)The court said, “I wonder if you truly reflect on yourself, what if you change men and women?”
(8)Daegu High Court
(9)Daegu District Court
httpsnnewsnavercommnewsarticle0880000807678sid=102
A’s lawyer said, “We admit all the facts of the prosecution’s indictment, but we will fight legally, saying that there was no sexual abuse or sexual shame on the victim.”
The intention was that the victim was already mature enough to have sexual self-determination He also expressed his intention to bring the victim to court as a witness
The court said that there is no need to call the victim in a situation where there is no dispute over the facts, and that it is judged that apart from the actual maturity of the victim, it is still legally in the stage of forming values
He also rebuked the accused strongly The court said, “Why is there a youth protection law? The purpose of the law is to protect those under the age of 18 by law,” adding, “Why do you call the victim when the defendant says in a letter of apology?”
He said he questioned whether it would not be a legal problem if men and women change, or whether they truly reflect on themselves
The student is already mature
The court told me to think about changing men and women