A case in which a minor couple fought and went to a constitutional petition, gisa

1 Husband A was searching for free movies on a TV monitor

If your wife, B, searches for such a place with an annoyed voice next to you, pictures of female celebrities may pop up, so don’t search

3 Husband A was also upset and started arguing, but during the argument, A, who couldn’t control her anger, threw a 150,000 won TV monitor on the floor and broke it

4 Surprised and angry wife B’s husband, A, sued for property damage

5 Prosecutor suspended indictment saying don’t fight between husband and wife

My husband is happy that he’s not punished, but the meaning of the word suspension says he’s guilty, but he’s letting it go without prosecution

My husband came to think of it, and I broke my TV, so why is it a crime of damage

Even that TV was what I bought before the wedding;

8 Mr. A claims that there is no suspicion of being guilty of damage

He filed a constitutional petition to cancel the suspension of prosecution

9 The husband of the Constitutional Court is right. He’s not destroying his own property. Cancel the suspension of prosecution

image text translation

(1)Constitutional TV Bought Before Marriage
(2)A broken husband is guilty of property damage
(3)impossible to punish
(4)⊙ Article Shipment 20170508 1116
(5)The Constitutional Court’s unique property. The property of others
(6)Hey, the decision to cancel the suspension of prosecution
(7)The Constitutional Court ruled that even if a husband breaks down a TV monitor that he bought and used before marriage during a fight, he cannot be punished for property damage

httpswwwlegaltimescokrnewsarticleViewhtmlidxno=32660

Leave a Comment