image text translation
(1)ID report
(2)Someone stole my cell phone while I was living in the Greek team’s accommodation
(3)Sunday, May 7, 2023 >
(4)I lost my red phone
(5)I think someone hacked it
(6)1242pm
(7)1254pm
(8)He’s been under threat since October last year
(9)iPhone is old, so I’m working hard to do it again
(10)General Civil Service Office
(11)Shin Kwang-hyun’s defense counsel
(12)When he refused to respond to the threat, he was vindictive of retaliation
(13)As part of his retaliation, he circulated videos related to his personal life
(14)ID Report · ● Video DM
(15)Hwang Ui-jo’s video
(16)Private account entry
(17)Hwang Ui-jo’s video is just sprinkled
(18)I was going to look at the pictures and videos
(19)Hwang Ui-jo’s free video sharing
(20)Hwang Ui-jo’s video sharing
(21)recommendation for
(22)Hwang Ui-jo’s video will be bought, and there are concerns about secondary damage
(23)WIZ*ONE’s video is so bright
The discloser stole Hwang Ui-jo’s phone, found a sexual relationship video there, and threatened to ask for money
I’ve never met Hwang Ui-jo personally
Hwang Ui-jo has consistently ignored it, so what do you mean a gaslighting criminal in retaliation? A proper novel and video distribution online
The sex video has not been revealed either by agreement or by a hidden camera
The discloser decided that it was a hidden camera video and distributed it
And in the circulated video, women also come out without mosaic, but they’re probably hidden camera victims
So at least the condemnation of the hidden camera crime is definitely not due to this sense of justice
image text translation
(1)Attention is focused on the possibility of legal responsibility In the case of Hwang Ui-jo, if the video is true, the key is whether the video was taken with the consent of the woman at the time of filming. According to Article 14 (1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning Punishment, etc. of Sexual Violence Crimes, a camera or other similar mechanical device may cause sexual desire or shame
(2)Therefore, a person who shoots a video shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than seven years or a fine of not more than 50 million won. However, if a video is taken by agreement between the parties, it shall not be punished
image text translation
(1)Lawyer Seo pointed out that Hwang Ui-jo should also consider whether he had illegally possessed the footage
(2)He explained that if Hwang Ui-jo was filmed without the consent of the other party, he could be punished for sexual violence, adding that it should be preceded by examining whether there was mutual agreement between men and women in video and photography In addition, those who re-distribute and possess videos and photos can also be punished He pointed out that he would be subject to aggravated punishment, especially for profit purposes
The key is whether the video is an agreed-upon filming or a hidden camera, but Hwang Ui-jo has no position on this
Hwang Ui-jo will be punished if it was a hidden camera, but if it was taken with mutual consent, it means that Hwang Ui-jo or the woman in the video is a one-sided victim