It’s wrong to stick to the cause of the Marine death by talking about life jackets

image text translation

(1)① Writing settings associated
(2)It’s wrong to obsess over the cause of a general marine death accident by talking about a life vest
(3)Going to the gallog
(4)421 views. Recommendation 17. Comments 14
(5)Since yesterday, I’ve been making a fuss about whether I gave you a life vest or not
(6)I think it is very wrong to blame the accident for not providing a life vest
(7)The real problem is the massive deployment of non-professional soldiers to a disaster site that has not yet subsided
(8)He complains that an accident would have happened, so it would have been okay if he had only worn a life jacket
(9)This is just one of the many accident risks that non-experts can easily think of at the scene of a disaster
(10)Only when someone who can gauge the risk of the field is in command of the work, can safety measures be prepared according to the work place and type of work
(11)Military officers are not experts who can gauge the risk of the disaster area, but the fact that they were given the command of work in the disaster area itself is already scheduled to explode
(12)And yet, if you take responsibility for the accident and cut off the officers, it’ll get better in the future
(13)And then, in the event of a disaster, I’ll repeat giving military officers command of the disaster area
(14)As long as non-experts are entrusted with the control of work in the disaster area, the risk of accidents does not change
(15)Only the type of accident varies, but the accident victims are forced to continue to come out
(16)I would like to ask back if the cause of the accident is actually reduced to the story of unpaid life vests, but isn’t it a psychology to use soldiers at the scene of a disaster
(17)If you really want to prevent the recurrence of an accident, you need to prepare a manual for professionals and work systems to direct the work and personnel of disaster-stricken areas

!

Leave a Comment