(1)The Korean government confirmed and announced the rumor that Fukushima’s sea is discolored due to the discharge of treated water
image text translation
(2)828/1830 Delivery 1353
(3)The South Korean government announced on Friday that it was fake news that the color of the sea around the nuclear power plant became yellow immediately after the discharge of treated water from the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant As a result of inquiring about the facts to TEPCO and receiving a response, it will continue to inform the public if false information is confirmed in the future
(4)A picture on the right shows a woman handing over a fish sashimi for lunch at a restaurant in Cheong Wa Dae, South Korea Park Gu-yeon, an image of treated water’s marine emission
(5)= Provided by Cheong Wa Dae, South Korea, on August 28, 2023
(6)The first deputy chief of the Office for Government Policy Coordination said, “What looked yellow is a phenomenon often seen in the sea of Fukushima because of the strong tide flow”It has nothing to do with the release,” he said, adding, “The photo time in question was before 1:13 p.m. when the treated water reached the sea at around 1:05 p.m. on the 24th. The Korean government tolerates the release of marine products, but it is also expected to slow domestic seafood consumption For this reason, Yoon Suk Yeoln President and Prime Minister Han Duck-soo ate seafood together for lunch on the 28th and appealed for safety The Blue House restaurant also provided halibut, croissant sashimi, and grilled mackerel on the lunch menu on the same day, stressing that it was the newsroom that “it was used by 1-5 times the usual people.” In Korea, the confrontation between the ruling and opposition parties intensified ahead of the upcoming general election, along with the largest opposition party in progressive circles, the Democratic Party, and the Yoon administration helped Japan commit environmental crimesSome say that the release of treated water has become the material for the regime’s attack, such as continuing criticism with Lee Jae-myung, CEO of
(7)How was this article? Let’s apply in response
(8)● Learn reports on articles New easy-to-understand perspectives
(1)Takahashi Koyu 2 hours ago
image text translation
(2)”Difromat,” an online magazine specializing in U.S. diplomacy and security, Tokyo correspondent
(3)If the relationship between Korea and Japan had improved like the relationship between Korea and Japan, the problem of treatment water would not have become so serious China said to Japan, which launched an offensive against China due to the Taiwan issue and semiconductor regulations, “Denial…To see more details
(4)It was helpful in 1290
(5)I’ll hide it
(6)knzkokokokokokokok 6시간 전
(7)President Yoon Suk Yeol seems to be the first decent president in Korean history It is a pity for Japan that the Korean presidential system is a diary. I hope the Japanese government will also make efforts to support the efforts of the current government in Korea
(8)130 replies
(9)① I’ll hide it
(10)1 hour before yack
(11)I can’t deny the feeling that this release came out of nowhere. It is important to explain about overseas, but I hope you can explain our people properly Only the release date was being reportedHow do you say bay water? How safe is it? I hope the prime minister will eat Fukushima’s seafood locally every month and appeal for safetyI think it’s going to prevent damage to Pungpyeong
(12)▼ 21 replies
(13)tkbook 2 hours ago
(14)I think Korea’s attitude is more reliable than it was during the boom between Korea and Japan I think it takes time, but I think improving Korea-Japan relations is the most important task Although I am not looking at the latest textbooks, it is also better for Japan to revise the textbooks from the end of the Shogunate to teach the U.S. relationship Japan has become a different country Of course, the existence of textbooks increases in modern times when nets are not trusted by modern people, including myself
(15)2 replies
(1)Hide it and lukkok 8 hours ago
image text translation
(2)The former administration has become much more rational than the Democratic administration, thinking that it may be good to say, “There is no way to confirm it, but I ask the Korean people to be careful,” “I recommend a delay to travel,” or “I strongly demand evacuation from Japan.” It would be nice if the approval rating did not lean toward the North Korean support party
(3)▼ 31 replies
(4)ugcolook 3 hours ago
(5)So far, I have not had a very good impression on the Korean government, but I think it is good that the Yoon administration is responding with sincerity to Japan regarding the water treatment issue I don’t think all Koreans are against the treatment, so I think it’s most important to be sincere with each other
(6)31 replies
(7)hikaaaaaaaaaaaaa 2 hours ago
(8)Basically, is it difficult evidence that fake information comes out? Fake does not work for things that can be clearly proven by scientific interpretation with numerical data I don’t know why the color of seawater, which was originally mixed with trace radioactive substances, is discolored Anyone can understand that
(9)▼ 0 replies
(10)Tkysfc 8 hours ago hide report 숨기기 report
(11)I think the Yoon regime is not sweet to Japan, but a politician who is determined to be stepped on by the liberal camp in mind at the tipping point of the times I think the current stance is the answer because I’m not good at it either
(12)▼ 13 replies
(13)Hey, hey, hey, hey. 18 hours ago
(14)There are various reports in each country when we have no choice but to investigate until we are convinced that what Japan is announcing is true, but I want to be able to see which reports are accurate and which are wrong
(15)· 3 replies
He seems to be very angry with China, but Korea seems to be enjoying it because the government says there is no problem
image text translation
(1)International Atomic Energy Agency IAEA Discharged TEPCO Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant’s Treatment Water Marine Discharge
(2)The plan issued a comprehensive report that “meets international safety standards.” How much do you understand about the safety of treated water
(3)93604 people are voting
(4)I fully understand48,051 votes
(5)No understanding 21,895 votes
(6)I understand it’s one of the two11,741 votes
(7)I don’t understand which way
(8)I can’t say either wayI don’t know.
(9)2621 votes
This is Yahoo’s poll