Unmade incidents during the Joseon Dynasty

(1)On February 16, 1533 King Jungjong 28th, an urgent report came from the administrative department of the capital of the Hanseong Joseon Dynasty
(2)A young child was found with his leg cut behind a shaman’s house near the Yongsan River
(3)He said, “If you carry me on your back, I can teach you the house where I cut my foot
(4)it is said that
(5)Our Han voice thinks that if we interrogate the child, it’ll be late and the suspect will run away
(6)I think it’s right to quickly get there with the kid and arrest the suspect
(7)King Jungjong was surprised to hear Han Seong-bu’s report and said
(8)If you don’t treat the child, he’ll definitely die, so care carefully so he doesn’t die
(9)Hurry up and call the Joseon-era capital security officer to arrest the suspects!
(10)The captain of the grapes held the king’s command and immediately released the troops to capture the suspects
(11)According to a detailed report from Han Sung-bu, this was the inside story of the case
(12)The house of Kim Gwi-seong, a military officer during the Gapsa Joseon Dynasty near the Yongsan River in February 1533, at the height of the cold
(13)This child was found with two feet amputated and his name was Gaetchun
(14)In the time of the Geumbu Joseon Dynasty, the judicial high authority asked the child why he had his foot cut off
(15)This is what the child said
(16)Someone cuts my leg with a knife and tells me to die
(17)That was it
(18)In other words, according to his account, he had his legs cut off with a knife by a gunman
(19)The gunman abandoned this kid near the Yongsan River
(20)The guard capital and palace defense of King Gapsa of the Joseon Dynasty in the movie
(21)And for the guard of the military Kimgung Palace in the Gapsa Joseon Dynasty, which lived near the Yongsan River, Jikgwaseong Fortress
(22)When I was on my way to work
(23)I found a baby with two legs cut off and reported it to the government office
(24)The government reported it to Hanseongbu, and Hanseong even reported it to King Jungjong
(25)In the course of the investigation, Rohan Beaduk was named as a private suspect
(26)According to Han Duck’s statement, Han Duck was traveling to and from his master’s house in January
(27)In the process, he found a statue down his waist, and he was walking down Irene Road
(28)It was said that Ahn brought her home to take care of her
(29)But the owner brought in a dirty childYou said you scolded him and put him back on the road
(30)But someone in the neighborhood took the child that Handok gave up again
(31)It’s gone
(32)So far, no one has heard the reason why he cut his feet, and the truth has yet to be solved
(33)of
(34)Suddenly, a slave named Jungdeok came and claimed that he was the child’s birth mother
(35)A slave named Jung-deok, who volunteered to be the child’s birth mother, said
(36)This is Okga I lost it on September 29 last year
(37)On February 17 this year, I was told to carry a child with a severed foot on his back
(38)My husband and I went after her, and she was in a good house
(39)An official at a law enforcement agency during the Uigumbu Joseon era once again asked the child why his foot was cut off
(40)The boy suddenly pointed out that he had cut off his foot, pointing to the fact that he had been feeding him porridgeThe king of King Jungjong, who was briefed on the incident, was also relieved, so he told his servants as follows
(41)For your information, this child is a slave
(42)Even if you didn’t kill this child’s feet well, your hurt heart is like killing himBecause I wanted to let her go because she wanted to be my birth mother
(43)have a questionBut here’s a mystery
(44)The following are the opinions posted to King Jungjong by the King’s Secretariat of the Joseon Dynasty
(45)There was a whole school in which His Highness allowed him to send the child whose foot was clearly amputated to his birth motherBut what we’ve looked into so far is that if Handok succeeds
(46)Open it
(47)A slave named Jung-deok calls himself the child’s birth mother
(48)Even though the distance between the two houses is not that far, I know where he is
(49)How can you believe that you didn’t know that you didn’t? Why don’t you lock both Handok and Jungduk together
(50)How can you do that
(51)Therefore, King Jungjong followed the horse of Seungjeong in the fall so that his father, Kim Gwi-sung, could care for the child with full strength so that he would not die
(52)I ordered you to decide
(53)But the case still hasn’t been solved and it’s gradually falling into a mysterySo King Jungjong went to the place where Handok and his child were
(54)the middle virtue
(55)I tried to investigate closely once again
(56)It’s a law enforcement agency in the Uigeumbu Joseon era. Who said yes
(57)Did you cut your foot
(58)Pointing at the slave child Handok, this person cut my foot
(59)Is there anything else you want to say? It’s okay. Feel free to say anything
(60)Go ahead
(61)A slave child, a man wearing a fur hat who cuts his feet, is next to him
(62)It was in
(63)After hearing all the news of the investigation, King Jungjong said
(64)What kind of personal feelings did the slave have that he picked Handok
(65)Well, this Phil should also quickly summon this man for questioning, according to Handok’s cut and the child’s statement that he had hair on his head!
(66)That’s it!
(67)The one who wore the hat next to it
(68)And King Jungjong said to Gapsa Kim Gwi-sung
(69)You’re going to take care of her carefully and make sure she doesn’t have enough to eat and wear, and you know what happens when she dies unfortunately
(70)I have to do it
(71)Your Highness, take care of your child with all your heart so that there is nothing missing
(72)I’ll do it
(73)As mentioned above, the self-proclaimed Jung-deok said that he lost his child in September last year after gathering him, and Han-deok said that he got it earlier this year and threw it away the next day due to the owner’s scolding The period between them is five months, and Jungjong said
(74)I’ve noticed a gap of five months
(75)During those five months, there was no one who took the child to where he was and when his foot was cut off, so if his foot was cut off, there would be no way that the child would be taken away, so he decided that knowing the point was the core of the case
(76)I don’t know that someone cut him off
(77)This incident was known to the entire Joseon court, and the three monks and other ministers of the Joseon Dynasty were carefully examined
(78)Although a slave child had his leg amputated and, in a way, it was not very important for people working for the country, everyone looked at it with interest, and Jungjong did not offer support to resolve the caseAnd at this time, reports of the Ministry of 知 Affairs’ 禁府 Affairs’ reservation of the management of Jeong 2 items belonging to the Ministry of Justice and the Ministry of 同府 Affairs’ 同府 Affairs of Dongugeum were posted
(79)All
(80)the judicial body of the Uigeumbu Joseon Dynasty
(81)I’ll tell you the details of the investigationWe took Handok to Derry Ai, and I saw him, and he asked who cut off four feet, so it’s HandokWhen I sat down with Handeok and Jungeok and asked who cut your foot, I pointed to Handeok againI said, “Did you cut it? It’s a knife.” And I cut it in the roomYour Highness, our money
(82)Answer me
(83)
(84)That’s what I said
(85)When did you cut it? So I cut it during the day I tied my hands together and covered my mouth with a cotton ball
(86)As
(87)I said it was me
(88)According to the child’s testimony, Handeok must have cut the child’s leg, and the Ministry of Justice was prepared to scandalize Handeok and interrogate him, and tried to obtain approval for a scandal from King Jungjong
(89)It was for drinking
(90)As mentioned above, Han-deok brought the child to the owner’s house around January, and the owner scolded him for being dirty and abandoned himBut according to Han Duck’s additional statement, a man named Mercury took the child back and then the palm took him backMercury and palm statements here made the case more mysterious
(91)I think it was the position of the investigator of the Joseon Dynasty who was in charge of the case
(92)The affidavit states that his slave carried a child, his feet were frostbite, and his form was dirty, so he ordered the slave to abandon him
(93)According to the statement on the palm, a child was brought to the owner’s house because his feet were black and swollen with frostbite. However, the owner scolded him, so he said he threw it away soon, and after that, he took the child back to his mother’s ears
(94)According to these affidavits, mercury and palm reaped the child that Handok abandonedIt’s a story that he went away, and this child was severely frostbite, but he definitely had two feet at this time
(95)Soon the Ministry of Justice caught and questioned the deceptions and made a statement regarding the childA child brought home two feet of frostbite, so one foot fell into the statue on February 5 and another foot fell into the statue on February 8And the people of Geumjeum and Eulbi testified that they saw this clearly, and soon it was a good thing
(96)Ziggyum, noted as an eyewitness, stated
(97)The witch Gwi-deok really took the child and saved him, but he didn’t see it when his feet fell out
(98)Eulby stated as follows
(99)I saw Gwi-duk trying to save a child with two feet of frostbite, but I didn’t see him when he lost his feet
(100)In other words, when he agreed with the testimony of Gwi-deok and was given up, he should get away with the fact that Gwi-deok became a strong suspect under the circumstances, but the problem is that this child testified that it was difficult to judge Handok because he cut his leg. Rather, Han-deok was a suspect
(101)So once again, the Ministry of Justice took Gwi-duk, who was the prime suspect in the circumstances, to the child and questioned him
(102)Boy, do you know this man’s virtue
(103)The child nodded
(104)Is it because he cut his feet
(105)The child did not answer this question
(106)Hey, did this man’s virtue save you
(107)Then the child nodded
(108)He said, “Have your feet been cut off when this man’s genius took you away?” And he answered
(109)No, I didn’t
(110)If so, it was clear that Handeok did not cut the child’s foot due to circumstances, and even though he thought twice about the testimony of the gold, silver, and others, Handeok was not charged. Of course, it was natural for the child to scandal Handeok because he said Handeok cut his leg, but he could not torture Handeok and interrogate him recklessly, believing only the words of this immature 5-year-old childAt this time, Uigeumbu told King Jungjong the following
(111)Your Highness, is there a law in Joseon that says that people after the age of 80 and before the age of 10 should not unconditionally be accepted as trueIt’s obvious that he took the child when he didn’t cut his foot, so can you tell that he didn’t cut it
(112)a man of virtue
(113)Even if there’s a child’s testimony, it’s only because of the fact that he’s got to
(114)But! The case is ambiguous, so we simply can’t take this case
(115)After hearing the report from the Ministry of Justice, Jungjong said
(116)You show the other person to the child, and if this person cuts off all four feet, the child says no
(117)If only Handok Handok cut his own, would a child say that because he loves Handok and Gwi-deok!Even if the Korean law tells us not to trust the words of a child under the age of 10, we can’t ignore the child’s testimony! Bo
(118)And on February 21, King Jungjong convened his servants and completed the whole school as follows
(119)Cutting is often cruel
(120)There is nothing more urgent about caring for the people than saving a young child for the first thing to do
(121)Prepare the seaweed appropriately and provide the food to the slave child. Since the investigation of this child’s work has not been completed yet, we made him protect it well at Kim Gwi-seong’s house, but now that Jung-deok is found to be the mother, the child should be returned to the mother
(122)And look closely to see if your foot fell off the statue or was cut with a knife
(123)You’ll be able to find outThe Ministry of Justice is required to have the medical-savvy councilor and Han Sung-bu’s nanggwan re-examine and inspect it
(124)In the end, Geumbu Master Lee Chang-moo took the lawmakers and made them look at the slave child
(125)Members of Parliament looked through and were briefed on the diagnosis results of members of ParliamentGeumbu and Seungjeongwon gave King Jungjong the Arooegi as a will of Uigeumbu
(126)It was that Lee Chang-moo, a Buddhist monk of Geumbu, took the lawmaker to look at a slave child with his foot cut off
(127)The place where the frostbite fell out is complete with the internal and external ankles and bone 骨s, and the tendons remain even though the flesh is rotting, but the child’s broken place is different
(128)The broken shin bone above the ankles is dated and new and skin has shrunk, so it must have been cut with a knife!
(129)According to the report, it was clear that the last child he picked up was a clear suspectGwi-duk said the child’s foot was apparently pulled out by the frostbite, but the doctor’s diagnosis showed that the child’s leg was cut off by a knifeIt’s because it’s clear that the impudent testified falsely
(130)Of course, it took the child’s testimony, and I was suspicious of Ji Han-deok, who played Jungjong, so I said to my subordinates, “Why don’t you torture Han-deok and interrogate him?”February 29th edition is wrong
(131)Kim Geum-sa has decided against the case itself
(132)I posted a new report
(133)Your Highness, although it was discovered by a councillor that a child’s leg was cut off by a knife, you should not be hasty in judging on the basis of the councillor’s words
(134)In the past, there was a case where a person called a relic was removed by a statue, but the foot also had the shape of being cut off with a knifeIn this way, humans often fall into frostbite, much less a soft child’s foot
(135)If that foot was caught in a statue, it wasn’t because he had an evil heart
(136)How can you be guilty of losing your foot because you didn’t treat it well
(137)But according to the MP, the boy’s leg was cut off by a knife, so it’s right to leave Handok alone and continue interrogating Gwi-duk
(138)Then King Jungjong responded and said
(139)The Lord’s words do not make any sense
(140)However, the child not only said that Handeok cut his leg, but also made it clear that he covered his mouth with a cotton pad, so even though he is a child, he doesn’t know what horses he is saying and what people don’t know!
(141)Or what kind of grudge would you have said this falsely
(142)Wouldn’t it be that the child went to another house by someone and then chased after Handeok and cut it secretly
(143)This matter is not to be recklessly discussed by the appropriate department aloneCall all the ministers to discuss it
(144)King Jungjong asked the ministers of Uijeongbu, the highest administrative body of Joseon, for their final opinionThus, in late February, the three victories made their opinions honest in relation to the slave child case
(145)That was honest
(146)Jeong Gwang-pil, the chief justice of Yeonguijeong
(147)It seems that what the slave child said was what Handok did, but strictly speaking, it cannot be confirmed that Handok cut itIf you think it’s unfair to make a big prison just by listening to a dim child’s words
(148)Oksa will be found out till the end, Your Holiness! In God’s opinion, it’s this kind of thing
(149)I don’t think there will be any harm!
(150)the order of the right arm of the left arm
(151)Did God hear of this incident
(152)In God’s will, the Arim of Uigeumbu is considered decent!
(153)Woo Eui-jung and Han Hyo-won
(154)If you look at the child’s words, it’s very clear that he covered his mouth and cut his foot, so it’s not a word that a young child can make upIt would be very gentle to find out the facts in a ugly way!
(155)4 to 5 years old
(156)I’ve moved from car house to car house, but if you look at the affidavits of many people
(157)with a prize in one’s hands
(158)I think it’s also clear
(159)Even if such a suspicious prison is interrogated until the end, the fairy won’t know
(160)On the contrary, an innocent man will dieWhat’s more, you might get frostbite and lose your feet
(161)Your Highness, make up your mind!
(162)In the end, the case ended like this, and there was no more way
(163)Even if it is tortured, false testimony by torture may come out, and if that happens, the case will fall further into mysteryAnyway, there was nothing I could do anymore
(164)He was released, and King Jungjong and the Joseon court ended the case by giving the slave child enormous food and wealth so that he would not be in poverty for the rest of his lifeJungjong is a genius
(165)And this case remained a permanent unsolved case during the Joseon Dynasty

(1)<3 line summary>
(2)11 A child was found near a river with a severed leg
(3)2 As the whole country focuses on the case, Han Sung-bu and Uigeumbu Seung-won have worked to solve the case
(4)3 However, it was impossible to make a judgment prematurely due to mixed testimony and ambiguous statements
(5)Late Joseon Period Unmade Incident Remains

(1)Do something to Jo Gwang-jo even if you’re half a slave LOL
(2)LOL. LOL
(3)But at that time, there’s no science investigation on SITV, so only witnesses
(4)If you don’t have it, you won’t get caught even if you kill everyone
(5)If you guess, there was a person wearing a fur hat next to Handeok when he cut his leg, but this is probably Handeok’s owner who told him to abandon his child. Yes, he lost his leg to the statue, and the child was confused in memory and remembered Handeok and his owner who abandoned him first
(6)Yes, 125180