(1)- Controversy over the confiscated fish bank
image text translation
(2)Artificial Beef Eobo
(3)Royal Seal for Queen Jangryeol 1676
(4)8 Confiscated Fishbo Controversy
(5)Chung Jin-ho, a collector of cultural properties
(6)I bought it because I thought it was artificial beobo
(7)I found out later
(8)I bought a craft, and it turned out that it was an artificial fish
(9)The National Palace Museum suggested selling it to us for 250 million won
(10)a price below the old tax
(11)Collectors are probably Korean heritage, so they sold it thinking it wouldn’t be a bad idea to sell it cheaply for the people
(12)National Palace Museum
(13)Refused to return suspension of transactions after taking the document
(14)Lawyer Park Young-man, Jeong’s lawyer
(15)Civil law recognizes the acquisition of good faith in cases of theft between individuals
(16)It means guaranteeing the rights of the rightful personPoliticians President Moon will not pursue hostile policies against North Korea. He has no intention of attacking North Korea
(17)1051 p.m
(18)Oh, Mr. Butterfly
(19)Today, Hell Joseon
(20)1. A cultural heritage collector paid 25 million won including taxes to buy crafts at an auction site, but it turned out that artificial rainbo leaked abroad during the Korean War
(21)2 When the National Palace Museum offered to buy eobo, the collector offered it for 250 million won, which is lower than the market price
(22)e 16617
(23)It was eight rounds
(24)Honorary gatekeeper 02 fumikaislove33 minutes ago
(25)3 But as soon as the museum received the item, it was
(26)He said it was stolen by the U.S. military and was not subject to transaction, so he stopped trading and didn’t pay for it
(27)4 The current collector either returns the fishbowl or
(28)You’re suing the state for a fair price
(29)But as soon as I got the poster, the museum washed my mouth and didn’t give me money
(30)a controversy that was confiscated after being sold
(31)Kim Hyun-jung, National Palace Museum Research Center
(32)The state didn’t confiscate or confiscate the fish bank
(33)Since Eobo is a crude oil property…I said
(34)President Moon asked McCain to explain the sharing of defense costs well
(35)The museum’s position is that Eobo is originally state-owned property, but who are you to get paid for it
(36)That’s right. And state-owned property is owned by the state again, so it’s not confiscation
(37)Lol, take care of yourself
(38)Naturally, the angry collector sued the state to keep his promise
(39)News Home Latest
(40)Lost a lawsuit for the return of a stolen Queen Jangryeol’s fish bank
(41)Songgo Time 2017-08-300630
(42)Let’s do this again
(43)a journalist’s page
(44)The auction site doesn’t recognize the possession of stolen goods
(45)It is not directly related to the contents of the articles on the foebo of Moon Jung-yong and Hyun Jong, which were illegally taken to the United States and returned. Yonhap News Agency’s data photo
(46)Seo Hwang Jae-ul = Yonhap News Reporter = Do Chosun’s artificial intelligence was misled
(47)The 寶 and royal family of the United States have a seal made for the 御 of Queen Ryeol
(48)A cultural book purchased on an auction site and delivered to the National Palace Museum
(49)The re-collector said he was ineligible for any compensation
(50)I can’t do it
(51)According to our civil law, the court also said that stolen goods are good faith
(52)In the case of purchasing in terms of not knowing the facts, it means not knowing the facts
(53)the trouble of requesting the return of the goods to be changed by the price of the rasso
(54)As it is, Virginia law applies to the language acquisition process
(55)I’ll stand that there’s no room for other property rights to be recognized by Mr. A
(56)In addition, the responsibility of the state must be secured, preserved, and managed
(57)In light of B’s burden, what property rights are A’s regarding the fish bank
(58)The National Palace Museum pays for it
(59)It’s hard to say that it’s illegal not to return it without returning it
(60)I pointed it out
(61)So according to that logic, the people bring the stolen goods that the U.S. military has stolen
(62)It means that the state has stolen again
(63)It’s a very frustrating conclusion
!