Lawyer Cho Sang-ho refutes Lee Soo-jin’s lie

image text translation

(1)Rep. Lee Soo-jin’s cutoff is because of the nonsense party
(2)When Rep. Lee Soo-jin was cut off, he is suddenly talking about Baekhyun-dong’s judgment, saying, “Representative Lee Jae-myung lied.”
(3)Rep. Lee Soo-jin himself said in his defection, “Looking back, I took the lead in supporting and helping representative Lee Jae-myung at every crisis, and I was more passionate than anyone else in making today’s party leader,” but suddenly mentioned the Baekhyun-dong ruling, saying that the party abandoned him and claimed that Lee Jae-myung lied about Baekhyun-dong He’s lying without even explaining what kind of lies Lee Jae-myung is in the corner of Baekhyun-dong’s ruling
(4)Did Lee Soo-jin do the trial like that while he was a judge Did you believe in someone you’re close to without asking or questioning? Then did you quickly overturn the judgment if you couldn’t do it to yourself
(5)The judgment in the Baekhyun-dong case explains the general legal principles of the mediation, saying, “The duties of public officials are legitimate.”
(6)In the conclusion, it was clarified that “if money and goods were received in the name of mediation, the crime would be established regardless of whether the specific mediation was actually conducted.”
(7)”As long as the Defendant Kim In-seop received money and valuables in exchange for the mediation, whether the Defendant’s mediation was illegal?”
(8)Regardless of whether the use area change is illegal or whether the use area change of Seongnam City has been made due to the defendant’s mediation, the crime of mediation is established
(9)This ruling confirms that there is no proof at all whether Kim In-seop actually engaged in an act of mediation or whether the act affected the decision of Seongnam City
(10)It is often said, “Judges speak by judgment.” It means that the judge will face-to-face hearing numerous records, court testimony, and other evidence investigations, and then reveal the results of the hearing with a final ruling I’m asking because you were a judge before Do you know the evidence records submitted to the court or the arguments and arguments of the parties, such as prosecutors and defendants, before the ruling is sentenced? Did you check the testimony of the witnesses in court? Or did you read the verdict? Were you even interested in Baekhyun-dong’s caseDid you ask me in charge of Baekhyun-dong’s argument? Does Baekhyun-dong’s words change from truth to lie in front of the private interest that the judge failed the nomination without confirming the least facts? If you did so at the trial, you wouldn’t dare to understand the resentment of the defendants
(11)Rep. Lee Soo-jin even heard sarcastic comments from many people asking if he was drinking and asking questions close to the travel 奇 he had shown at the standing committee Representative Lee Soo-jin’s claim of victims of judicial manipulation, which was the basis for recruiting human resources and strategic nomination, was rather tarnished by statements that he served as a perpetrator It was a political blow to the Democratic Party that eventually nominated Rep. Lee Soo-jin The party leader could not overturn the results of the people’s evaluation just because he sided with Lee Jae-myung That’s the system nomination that our party is proud of Rep. Lee Soo-jin, please keep in mind that the reason for the cutoff is the very random party that changes words frequently depending on your interests and does not fit the situation
(12)Please.
(13)#Cho Sang-ho #Geumcheon-gu #Democratic Party of Korea #National Assembly Member #Preliminary Candidate
(14)#Gasan-dong #Siheung-dong #Doksan-dong #Baekhyun-dong #Attorney #Lee Soo-jin
(15)#Judge #Lee Jae-myung Attorney
(16)093 people
(17)I hope you watch it
(18)Cho Sang-ho, a lawyer, passed the Geumcheon-gu election
(19)Good fighting power

!

Leave a Comment